DULAL AHMED MAZUMDAR vs SRI KUJENDRA DOLEY Advocate - MR. N UPADHAYAY, ,SC, IRRIGATION — I.A.(Civil) /99/2026
Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 12. Disposed: --Disposed Of on 01st April 2026.
CNR: GAHC010006492026
e-Filing Number
09-01-2026
Filing Number
I.A.(Civil) /345/2026
Filing Date
09-01-2026
Registration No
I.A.(Civil) /99/2026
Registration Date
19-01-2026
Judge
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Coram
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Of
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DULAL AHMED MAZUMDAR
Adv. MR S AHMED,G UDDIN,G UDDIN, ,G UDDIN
TAPAN DAS
Adv. MS PURNIMA ADHIKARI
TAYABUR RAHMAN LASKAR
Adv. MS PURNIMA ADHIKARI
NAZIR UDDIN BARBHUIYA
Adv. MS PURNIMA ADHIKARI
MAIJUL HOQUE LASKAR
Adv. MS PURNIMA ADHIKARI
SURANJAN DAS
Adv. MS PURNIMA ADHIKARI
MONISH KANTI DEY PURKAYASTHA
Adv. MS PURNIMA ADHIKARI
FAIZUR RAHMAN,
Adv. MS PURNIMA ADHIKARI
Respondent(s)
SRI KUJENDRA DOLEY Advocate - MR. N UPADHAYAY, ,SC, IRRIGATION
SRI LUHITESH CHANDRA PATAK
AKBAR HUSSAIN CHOUDHURY,
NAKUL CHANDRA BISWAS
RAMANDRA NARAYAN BARMON
MR HEMANTA NARZARY
MR MAHENDRA MOHAN BORO
K M GOPAL SENA RAJ KUMAR
MR SURDAS BATTACHARJEE
MR BROJEN MALAKAR
K M GOPAL SENA RAJ KUMAR
DHRUBAJYOTI ROY CHOWDHURY
Orders
The Gauhati High Court allowed an Interlocutory Application to implead Shri Dhrubajyoti Roy Choudhury, the present Chief Engineer of the Irrigation Department, as Respondent No. 12 in Contempt Case No. 151/2017. The court found that the Chief Engineer was a necessary party to the proceedings given his current position and role in the department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Gauhati High Court allowed an Interlocutory Application to implead Shri Dhrubajyoti Roy Choudhury, the present Chief Engineer of the Irrigation Department, as Respondent No. 12 in Contempt Case No. 151/2017. The court found that the Chief Engineer was a necessary party to the proceedings given his current position and role in the department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts