Vegesna Subba Raju, vs The State of AP., Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE — WP/7126/2016

Next hearing: 28th April 2026.

Next hearing 28-Apr-2026

CNR: APHC010788872016

Filing Number

WP/37893/2016

Filing Date

03-Mar-2016

Registration No

WP/7126/2016

Registration Date

03-Mar-2016

Judge

Nyapathy Vijay

Coram

Nyapathy Vijay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

REVENUE (MISC.MATTERS) ( 37 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vegesna Subba Raju,

    Adv. V V RAVI PRASAD

  2. 2.Vegesna Murthy Raju,

    Adv. V V RAVI PRASAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of AP., Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE

  2. 2.The District Collecltor,

  3. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer,

  4. 4.The Tahsildar,

  5. 5.A.V.V.S.Suryanarayana Raju,

    Adv. K V L NARASIMHA RAO

Case History

  1. 28-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Nyapathy VijayView PDF

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Nyapathy VijayView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the writ petition's main relief declaring respondents' inaction illegal but appointed an Advocate Commissioner to inspect the disputed drainage channel (Murugukondu) and submit a factual report. The Commissioner was tasked with visiting the land in Sivadevuni Chikkala Village and documenting the drainage channel's current status, with fees of Rs. 40,000 plus Rs. 10,000 expenses to be paid by the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Admission (Fisheries)

    Nyapathy Vijay

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Admission (Fisheries)

    Nyapathy Vijay

  6. 02-Apr-2026

    Nyapathy VijayView PDF

  7. 02-Apr-2026

    Admission (Fisheries)

    Nyapathy Vijay

  8. 31-Mar-2026

    Nyapathy VijayView PDF

  9. 31-Mar-2026

    Admission (Fisheries)

    Nyapathy Vijay

  10. 16-Mar-2026

    Nyapathy VijayView PDF

  11. 19-Dec-2025

    K Sreenivasa ReddyView PDF

  12. 15-Dec-2025

    Admission (Fisheries)

    K Sreenivasa Reddy

  13. 08-Dec-2025

    K Sreenivasa ReddyView PDF

  14. 01-Dec-2025

    Admission (Fisheries)

    K Sreenivasa Reddy

  15. 24-Nov-2025

    K Sreenivasa ReddyView PDF

  16. 14-Oct-2025

    K Sreenivasa ReddyView PDF

  17. 22-Sep-2025

    K Sreenivasa ReddyView PDF

  18. 16-Sep-2025

    Admission (Fisheries)

    K Sreenivasa Reddy

  19. 02-Sep-2025

    Admission (Fisheries)

    K Sreenivasa Reddy

  20. 21-Aug-2025

    K Sreenivasa ReddyView PDF

  21. 21-Aug-2025

    K Sreenivasa ReddyView PDF

  22. 20-Aug-2025

    Admission (Fisheries)

    K Sreenivasa Reddy

  23. 13-Aug-2025

    K Sreenivasa ReddyView PDF

  24. 13-Aug-2025

    Admission

    K Sreenivasa Reddy

  25. 06-Aug-2025

    Admission

    K Sreenivasa Reddy

  26. 29-Jul-2025

    Admission

    K Sreenivasa Reddy

  27. 18-Jul-2025

    Specially Identified Cases

    Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

  28. 03-Jul-2025

    Gannamaneni Ramakrishna PrasadView PDF

  29. 29-Apr-2025

    Gannamaneni Ramakrishna PrasadView PDF

  30. 29-Apr-2025

    Specially Identified Cases

    Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

  31. 25-Mar-2025

    Gannamaneni Ramakrishna PrasadView PDF

  32. 25-Mar-2025

    Admission (Fisheries)

    Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

  33. 04-Mar-2025

    Gannamaneni Ramakrishna PrasadView PDF

  34. 04-Mar-2025

    Admission (Fisheries)

    Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

  35. 25-Feb-2025

    Tarlada Rajasekhar RaoView PDF

  36. 11-Feb-2025

    Admission (Revenue)

    Ninala Jayasurya

  37. 04-Feb-2025

    Ninala JayasuryaView PDF

  38. 28-Apr-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  39. 03-Mar-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/7126/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the writ petition's main relief declaring respondents' inaction illegal but appointed an Advocate Commissioner to inspect the disputed drainage channel (Murugukondu) and submit a factual report. The Commissioner was tasked with visiting the land in Sivadevuni Chikkala Village and documenting the drainage channel's current status, with fees of Rs. 40,000 plus Rs. 10,000 expenses to be paid by the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case