K. SANYASI, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST. vs THE STATE OF A.P.,MUN.ADMN.,HYD.,& ANR. Advocate - GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP, ,J DILEEP KUMAR — WP/39426/2014

Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Dec-2014

CNR: APHC010774072014

Filing Number

WP/213328/2014

Filing Date

22-Dec-2014

Registration No

WP/39426/2014

Registration Date

22-Dec-2014

Judge

Harinath.n

Coram

Harinath.n

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MUNICIPALITY AND URBAN DEVP.(MISC.MATTERS) ( 30 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K. SANYASI, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST.

    Adv. G VENKATA REDDY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF A.P.,MUN.ADMN.,HYD.,& ANR. Advocate - GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP, ,J DILEEP KUMAR

  2. 2.Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Harinath.nView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 39426/2014 K. Sanyasi challenged the Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation's selective demolition of the second-floor structures of his building (D.No. 55-6-39) while leaving identical neighboring structures untouched, claiming the action was illegal, arbitrary, and discriminatory. The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the petition as infructuous on June 16, 2026, after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the cause no longer survived for consideration, finding no merit-based adjudication necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Dec-2024

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    B Krishna Mohan

  4. 24-Dec-2014

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 22-Dec-2014

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/39426/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 39426/2014 K. Sanyasi challenged the Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation's selective demolition of the second-floor structures of his building (D.No. 55-6-39) while leaving identical neighboring structures untouched, claiming the action was illegal, arbitrary, and discriminatory. The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the petition as infructuous on June 16, 2026, after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the cause no longer survived for consideration, finding no merit-based adjudication necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case