Nallagorla Srinivasa Rao, vs The Fedbank Financial Services Limited, Advocate - VENKATA DURGA RAO ANANTHA — WP/36230/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
CNR: APHC010702912025
Filing Number
WP/53485/2025
Filing Date
23-Dec-2025
Registration No
WP/36230/2025
Registration Date
24-Dec-2025
Judge
Lisa Gill , Ninala Jayasurya
Coram
Lisa Gill , Ninala Jayasurya
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
Debt Recovery tribunal Matters ( 86 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 14-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Nallagorla Srinivasa Rao,
Adv. VINOD KUMAR PEMMASANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Fedbank Financial Services Limited, Advocate - VENKATA DURGA RAO ANANTHA
-
2.The Debt Recovery Tribunal,
Case History
-
19-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
19-Jun-2026
Admission
Lisa Gill , Ninala Jayasurya
-
10-Apr-2026
Lisa Gill,ninala JayasuryaView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
Lisa Gill,ninala JayasuryaView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Andhra Pradesh adjourned the Writ Petition (WP No. 36230 of 2025) challenging Fedbank Financial Services Limited's securitization proceedings and directed to list the case on 19.06.2026. The court granted the bank's request for an opportunity to file a counter-affidavit within three weeks, with the petitioner's reply due within one week thereafter. The interim order protecting the petitioner's property from dispossession was extended and continues till the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jan-2026
For Admission
R Raghunandan Rao , T.c.d.sekhar
-
24-Dec-2025
R Raghunandan Rao,t.c.d.sekharView PDF
-
24-Dec-2025
R Raghunandan Rao,t.c.d.sekharView PDF
-
24-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP/36230/2025
Summary: The High Court of Andhra Pradesh adjourned the Writ Petition (WP No. 36230 of 2025) challenging Fedbank Financial Services Limited's securitization proceedings and directed to list the case on 19.06.2026. The court granted the bank's request for an opportunity to file a counter-affidavit within three weeks, with the petitioner's reply due within one week thereafter. The interim order protecting the petitioner's property from dispossession was extended and continues till the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts