Smt. Martur Lakshmi Gayathri, vs Karavadi Venkata Krishnam Raju, Advocate - PUPPALA SRINIVASA RAO — TRCMP/421/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 31st March 2026.
CNR: APHC010685152025
Filing Number
TRCMP/52090/2025
Filing Date
16-Dec-2025
Registration No
TRCMP/421/2025
Registration Date
20-Dec-2025
Judge
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao
Coram
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
CIVIL Section
Decision Date
31-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Smt. Martur Lakshmi Gayathri,
Adv. P MALLIKHARJUNA RAO
Respondent(s)
-
1.Karavadi Venkata Krishnam Raju, Advocate - PUPPALA SRINIVASA RAO
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
31-Mar-2026
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna RaoView PDF
The High Court of Andhra Pradesh allowed the wife's petition to transfer a divorce case from Family Court, Nellore to Family Court, Ongole under Section 24 CPC. The court held that in matrimonial proceedings, the wife's convenience must be prioritized over the husband's inconvenience, considering her financial constraints and the ~150 km distance that would burden her attendance. The case record was ordered transferred within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
For Orders
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao
-
30-Mar-2026
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna RaoView PDF
-
29-Jan-2026
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna RaoView PDF
-
29-Jan-2026
For Admission
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao
-
26-Dec-2025
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna RaoView PDF
-
26-Dec-2025
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna RaoView PDF
-
26-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. TRCMP/421/2025
The High Court of Andhra Pradesh allowed the wife's petition to transfer a divorce case from Family Court, Nellore to Family Court, Ongole under Section 24 CPC. The court held that in matrimonial proceedings, the wife's convenience must be prioritized over the husband's inconvenience, considering her financial constraints and the ~150 km distance that would burden her attendance. The case record was ordered transferred within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts