KANCHARLA MAHESH BABU, GUNTUR DIST vs PROJECT DIRECTOR & ADDL. DPC, DWMA, MGNREGS, GUNTUR & 3 OT Advocate - GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV, ,M S R CHANDRA MURTHY — WP/9549/2014
Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 31st March 2026.
CNR: APHC010630492014
Filing Number
WP/48034/2014
Filing Date
19-Mar-2014
Registration No
WP/9549/2014
Registration Date
27-Mar-2014
Judge
Harinath.n
Coram
Harinath.n
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVP., (MISC.MATTERS) ( 35 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Decision Date
31-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KANCHARLA MAHESH BABU, GUNTUR DIST
Adv. J SUDHEER
Respondent(s)
-
1.PROJECT DIRECTOR & ADDL. DPC, DWMA, MGNREGS, GUNTUR & 3 OT Advocate - GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV, ,M S R CHANDRA MURTHY
-
2.Talluri Nagarjuna,
-
3.Talluri Prabhudasu (Ravi),
-
4.Government of A.P. Rep by its Principal Secretary,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
31-Mar-2026
Harinath.nView PDF
The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the writ petition filed by Kancharla Mahesh Babu challenging an appointment order (dated 18.02.2013) issued to respondents 2 and 3 as Field Assistant under MGNREGS as infructuous, after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the cause of action no longer survives. No costs were awarded and all pending miscellaneous petitions were closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
Specially Identified Cases
Harinath.n
-
23-Mar-2026
Harinath.nView PDF
-
18-Mar-2026
Specially Identified Cases
Harinath.n
-
12-Mar-2026
Harinath.nView PDF
-
01-Jun-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Mar-2014
Case filed
Registration No. WP/9549/2014
The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the writ petition filed by Kancharla Mahesh Babu challenging an appointment order (dated 18.02.2013) issued to respondents 2 and 3 as Field Assistant under MGNREGS as infructuous, after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the cause of action no longer survives. No costs were awarded and all pending miscellaneous petitions were closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts