Thamatam Narendra Bhupal Reddy, vs The State of A.P., Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLRC/1205/2023

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397,401. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010624402023

Filing Number

CRLP/12552/2023

Filing Date

12-Dec-2023

Registration No

CRLRC/1205/2023

Registration Date

22-Dec-2023

Judge

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Coram

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLRC ( 42 )

Sub-Category

Other offences not covered above ( 141 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 13-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397,401

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Thamatam Narendra Bhupal Reddy,

    Adv. MURALI LINCOLN

  2. 2.Thamatam Kumar Indra Karan Reddy,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of A.P., Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.Undela Penchal Reddy,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Venkata Jyothirmai PratapaView PDF

    Summary The Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed the criminal revision filed by two young accused (ages 18-19) challenging the trial court's cognizance order against them for alleged assault under IPC Section 324 r/w 34. The court held that at the cognizance stage, disputed factual questions cannot be resolved and the trial court's finding of a prima facie case based on the complainant's statement was sufficient. The court disposed of the revision without interference but directed the trial court to expeditiously complete the main case within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    For Orders

    Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

  4. 22-Aug-2024

    For Extension Of Interim Orders

    Dr V R K Krupa Sagar

  5. 01-Aug-2024

    Dr V R K Krupa SagarView PDF

  6. 01-Aug-2024

    Dr V R K Krupa SagarView PDF

  7. 23-Apr-2024

    For Extension Of Interim Orders

    T Mallikarjuna Rao

  8. 02-Apr-2024

    T Mallikarjuna RaoView PDF

  9. 26-Mar-2024

    For Extension Of Interim Orders

    T Mallikarjuna Rao

  10. 19-Mar-2024

    T Mallikarjuna RaoView PDF

  11. 19-Mar-2024

    T Mallikarjuna RaoView PDF

  12. 13-Mar-2024

    For Extension Of Interim Orders

    T Mallikarjuna Rao

  13. 28-Feb-2024

    T Mallikarjuna RaoView PDF

  14. 28-Feb-2024

    T Mallikarjuna RaoView PDF

  15. 07-Feb-2024

    For Admission

    K Sreenivasa Reddy

  16. 27-Dec-2023

    K Sreenivasa ReddyView PDF

  17. 27-Dec-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 12-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLRC/1205/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed the criminal revision filed by two young accused (ages 18-19) challenging the trial court's cognizance order against them for alleged assault under IPC Section 324 r/w 34. The court held that at the cognizance stage, disputed factual questions cannot be resolved and the trial court's finding of a prima facie case based on the complainant's statement was sufficient. The court disposed of the revision without interference but directed the trial court to expeditiously complete the main case within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case