Sree Vijayawada Gosamrakshana Sangam vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - GP FOR ENDOWMENTS — WP/32243/2016

Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Apr-2017

CNR: APHC010585592016

Filing Number

WP/172359/2016

Filing Date

21-Sep-2016

Registration No

WP/32243/2016

Registration Date

21-Sep-2016

Judge

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

Coram

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

DISPOSITION /EVICTION ( 23 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sree Vijayawada Gosamrakshana Sangam

    Adv. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - GP FOR ENDOWMENTS

  2. 2.The Commissioner of Endowments

  3. 3.The District Collector and Magistrate

  4. 4.Sree Durgamalleswara Swamy Varla Devasthanam

    Adv. K MADHAVA REDDY (SC FOR ENDOWMENTS AR)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Tarlada Rajasekhar RaoView PDF

    The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed Writ Petition No. 32243/2016 as infructuous on June 18, 2026. The petitioner, Sree Vijayawada Gosamrakshana Sangam, sought to challenge an eviction order from land in Vijayawada, but the court found the case no longer viable after the petitioner's counsel indicated the cause of action no longer survived. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2017

    For Admission & Hearing

    C.praveen Kumar

  4. 21-Sep-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/32243/2016

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed Writ Petition No. 32243/2016 as infructuous on June 18, 2026. The petitioner, Sree Vijayawada Gosamrakshana Sangam, sought to challenge an eviction order from land in Vijayawada, but the court found the case no longer viable after the petitioner's counsel indicated the cause of action no longer survived. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case