Vandadi Venkateswarulu, vs The State of Andhra Pradesh rep., by its Principal Secretary Advocate - GP FOR ENDOWMENTS, ,SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI — WP/5785/2016

Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 06-Apr-2016

CNR: APHC010509722016

Filing Number

WP/30262/2016

Filing Date

22-Feb-2016

Registration No

WP/5785/2016

Registration Date

22-Feb-2016

Judge

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

Coram

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

ENDOWMENTS (MISC.MATTERS) ( 14 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vandadi Venkateswarulu,

    Adv. V R REDDY KOVVURI

  2. 2.Y.Brahmananda Reddy,

  3. 3.B.Bhaskar,

  4. 4.Vaka Mallikarjun,

  5. 5.N.G.V.Ramana,

  6. 6.A.Narayana,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh rep., by its Principal Secretary Advocate - GP FOR ENDOWMENTS, ,SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI

  2. 2.The Commissioner of Endowments,

  3. 3.Sri Veera Bhadra Swamy Temple,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Tarlada Rajasekhar RaoView PDF

    The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the writ petition as infructuous on June 19, 2026, after the petitioners' counsel stated the petition had become moot due to efflux of time. The petitioners, who were trust board members of Sri Veera Bhadra Swamy Temple, had sought restoration of their board tenure that was cut short following Act No. 8 of 2014 (which was later struck down), but the court found no relief was necessary given the passage of time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2016

    For Extension Of Time

    Challa Kodanda Ram

  4. 22-Feb-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5785/2016

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the writ petition as infructuous on June 19, 2026, after the petitioners' counsel stated the petition had become moot due to efflux of time. The petitioners, who were trust board members of Sri Veera Bhadra Swamy Temple, had sought restoration of their board tenure that was cut short following Act No. 8 of 2014 (which was later struck down), but the court found no relief was necessary given the passage of time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case