G CHAYA PADMINI vs MUTTA LAKSHMI NARASAMMA — CRP/2425/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010497552025

Filing Number

CRP/37489/2025

Filing Date

16-Sep-2025

Registration No

CRP/2425/2025

Registration Date

17-Sep-2025

Judge

Ravi Nath Tilhari

Coram

Ravi Nath Tilhari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRP ( 9 )

Sub-Category

ARTICLE 227 ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 14-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.G CHAYA PADMINI

    Adv. MSVS SUDHA RANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUTTA LAKSHMI NARASAMMA

  2. 2.Mutta Mounica

  3. 3.Mutta Ramya

  4. 4.Mutta Varaha Venkata Rajesh,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Ravi Nath TilhariView PDF

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Ravi Nath TilhariView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the defendant's revision petition challenging the trial court's rejection of an application to dismiss the plaintiffs' mortgage recovery suit. The court held that: (1) Section 214 of the Indian Succession Act does not bar suit institution without a succession certificate—it only bars passing decrees without one; and (2) under Article 62 of the Limitation Act, the 12-year limitation period for mortgage debt enforcement begins when money becomes due (here, two years after execution, i.e., 25.02.2006), not from the mortgage deed date, making the suit filed 11.10.2017 timely. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Ravi Nath TilhariView PDF

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Admission

    Ravi Nath Tilhari

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Ravi Nath TilhariView PDF

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Admission

    Ravi Nath Tilhari

  8. 31-Jan-2026

    Ravi Nath TilhariView PDF

  9. 23-Jan-2026

    Admission

    Ravi Nath Tilhari

  10. 08-Jan-2026

    Ravi Nath TilhariView PDF

  11. 26-Dec-2025

    Admission

    Ravi Nath Tilhari

  12. 12-Dec-2025

    Ravi Nath TilhariView PDF

  13. 17-Oct-2025

    For Admission

    R Raghunandan Rao

  14. 26-Sep-2025

    R Raghunandan RaoView PDF

  15. 26-Sep-2025

    R Raghunandan RaoView PDF

  16. 26-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 16-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRP/2425/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the defendant's revision petition challenging the trial court's rejection of an application to dismiss the plaintiffs' mortgage recovery suit. The court held that: (1) Section 214 of the Indian Succession Act does not bar suit institution without a succession certificate—it only bars passing decrees without one; and (2) under Article 62 of the Limitation Act, the 12-year limitation period for mortgage debt enforcement begins when money becomes due (here, two years after execution, i.e., 25.02.2006), not from the mortgage deed date, making the suit filed 11.10.2017 timely. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case