UPPU ANJANEYULU vs KOTI VEERAIAH — CRP/1691/2022

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED NO COSTS on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010450722022

Filing Number

CRP/36640/2022

Filing Date

27-Aug-2022

Registration No

CRP/1691/2022

Registration Date

30-Aug-2022

Judge

Harinath.n

Coram

Harinath.n

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

CIVIL Section

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CLOSED NO COSTS

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UPPU ANJANEYULU

    Adv. SATYANARAYANA NIMMALA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KOTI VEERAIAH

  2. 2.Uppu Gowramma

  3. 3.Uppu Mahanandi

    Adv. P PRABHAKAR RAO

  4. 4.Kusunuri Malleswari

  5. 5.Vale Siva Nageswaramma

  6. 6.Uppu Koteswari

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Harinath.nView PDF

    The High Court of Andhra Pradesh closed Civil Revision Petition No. 1691/2022 as infructuous, finding that the underlying suit OS.No.126/2005 had already been decreed by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Macherla, rendering the revision petition without merit. No costs were awarded, and all pending miscellaneous petitions were also closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Dec-2022

    For Admission

    Subba Reddy Satti

  4. 07-Dec-2022

    For Admission

    Subba Reddy Satti

  5. 06-Dec-2022

    For Admission

    Subba Reddy Satti

  6. 26-Sep-2022

    Admission

    Battu Devanand

  7. 15-Sep-2022

    For Admission (Crp Matters)

    Battu Devanand

  8. 01-Sep-2022

    Battu DevanandView PDF

  9. 01-Sep-2022

    Battu DevanandView PDF

  10. 01-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 27-Aug-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRP/1691/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh closed Civil Revision Petition No. 1691/2022 as infructuous, finding that the underlying suit OS.No.126/2005 had already been decreed by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Macherla, rendering the revision petition without merit. No costs were awarded, and all pending miscellaneous petitions were also closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case