GUDURI VENKATA SUNIL KUMAR vs GUDURI BHAVANI — CRP/1974/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 115. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010443402022

Filing Number

CRP/36056/2022

Filing Date

24-Aug-2022

Registration No

CRP/1974/2022

Registration Date

29-Sep-2022

Judge

Harinath.n

Coram

Harinath.n

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

CIVIL Section

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED NO COSTS

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 115

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GUDURI VENKATA SUNIL KUMAR

    Adv. P SRIDHAR REDDY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GUDURI BHAVANI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Harinath.nView PDF

    The High Court of Andhra Pradesh allowed both Civil Revision Petitions, holding that the petitioner's explanations for delay in pursuing matrimonial cases were genuine and trustworthy. The court found the petitioner was a victim of circumstances—his counsel died in 2015 and his father in 2016—and permitted him to file and follow up applications for restoration of the matrimonial proceedings to the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    For Admission (Crp Matters)

    Harinath.n

  4. 14-Aug-2025

    Specially Identified Cases

    T.c.d.sekhar

  5. 31-Jul-2025

    T.c.d.sekharView PDF

  6. 31-Jul-2025

    Specially Identified Cases

    T.c.d.sekhar

  7. 17-Jul-2025

    T.c.d.sekharView PDF

  8. 26-Jun-2025

    T.c.d.sekharView PDF

  9. 30-Sep-2022

    Battu DevanandView PDF

  10. 30-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 24-Aug-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRP/1974/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh allowed both Civil Revision Petitions, holding that the petitioner's explanations for delay in pursuing matrimonial cases were genuine and trustworthy. The court found the petitioner was a victim of circumstances—his counsel died in 2015 and his father in 2016—and permitted him to file and follow up applications for restoration of the matrimonial proceedings to the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case