Matam Siddeshwar vs Sri Vinod Kumar G. Agrawal Advocate - GP FOR ENDOWMENTS, ,V T M PRASAD — CC/1569/2013
Disposed: Contested--CLOSED NO COSTS on 01st April 2026.
CNR: APHC010429822013
Filing Number
CC/5729/2013
Filing Date
30-Aug-2013
Registration No
CC/1569/2013
Registration Date
02-Sep-2013
Judge
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
Coram
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
OS Section
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CLOSED NO COSTS
Last updated 27-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Matam Siddeshwar
Adv. K R PRABHAKAR
-
2.Shivadanam Prem Kumar
-
3.Matam Gangadharaiah Swamy
-
4.Heeremat Veera Basavaiah,
-
5.Cherukurimatam Parameswaraiah
-
6.Ambeda Satish Kumar
-
7.Sunnamaradi Mallikarjuna,
-
8.Heeremat Vidhyadhar
-
9.Kandalam Basava Shankar
-
10.Kandukallu Jangam Kalyanamayya
-
11.Rudrappa Sivanandam
-
12.Kasinathuni Veera Bhadraiah
-
13.Kasulanati Sathyanarayana,
-
14.Panditharadyula Visweswara Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sri Vinod Kumar G. Agrawal Advocate - GP FOR ENDOWMENTS, ,V T M PRASAD
-
2.Sri.T. Satyanarayana Rao,
-
3.S.S.Chandra sekhar Azad,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Venkateswarlu NimmagaddaView PDF
Summary The High Court of Andhra Pradesh closed a contempt case filed against government officials for willful disobedience of interim orders dated 11.06.2013. Since the underlying writ petition was already disposed of on 20.09.2024 with petitioners' rights substantially complied with, and the interim orders merged with final orders making them unenforceable, the court found no purpose in continuing the contempt proceedings and closed the case without imposing penalties or costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Likely To Be Declared As Infructuous
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
-
31-Mar-2026
Venkateswarlu NimmagaddaView PDF
-
22-Aug-2015
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Aug-2013
Case filed
Registration No. CC/1569/2013
Summary The High Court of Andhra Pradesh closed a contempt case filed against government officials for willful disobedience of interim orders dated 11.06.2013. Since the underlying writ petition was already disposed of on 20.09.2024 with petitioners' rights substantially complied with, and the interim orders merged with final orders making them unenforceable, the court found no purpose in continuing the contempt proceedings and closed the case without imposing penalties or costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts