THE CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION vs G.RAJA RAO Advocate - G SEENA KUMAR — WA /206/2023
Case under Letters Patent, 1866 Section 15. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED NO COSTS on 31st March 2026.
CNR: APHC010421222022
Filing Number
WA /34200/2022
Filing Date
16-08-2022
Registration No
WA /206/2023
Registration Date
01-02-2023
Judge
BATTU DEVANAND , A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
Coram
BATTU DEVANAND , A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
WA ( 27 )
Sub-Category
CORPORATIONS ( 43 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Decision Date
31st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED NO COSTS
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION
Adv. O UDAYA KUMAR
The Regional Manager,
Respondent(s)
G.RAJA RAO Advocate - G SEENA KUMAR
The Union of India,
Adv. Pasala Ponna Rao,DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
Hearing History
Judge: BATTU DEVANAND , A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ORDERS
ADMISSION
FOR DISMISSAL
FOR DISMISSAL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 03-02-2023 | FOR ADMISSION | |
| 01-12-2025 | FOR ORDERS | |
| 17-11-2025 | ADMISSION | |
| 03-11-2025 | FOR DISMISSAL | |
| 28-10-2025 | FOR DISMISSAL |
Orders
Summary The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed a writ appeal by the Central Warehousing Corporation but upheld the lower court's decision granting the retired employee arrears and pension benefits based on a 2011 office order fixing his pay under the Industrial Dearness Allowance (IDA) pattern. The court clarified that a 2014 circular attempting to make the IDA switchover voluntary was not binding on the petitioner since it was issued after his retirement, and directed payment of arrears with 9% interest from 1998 onwards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed a writ appeal by the Central Warehousing Corporation but upheld the lower court's decision granting the retired employee arrears and pension benefits based on a 2011 office order fixing his pay under the Industrial Dearness Allowance (IDA) pattern. The court clarified that a 2014 circular attempting to make the IDA switchover voluntary was not binding on the petitioner since it was issued after his retirement, and directed payment of arrears with 9% interest from 1998 onwards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts