Smt. Vallurupalli Sailaja vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/7670/2019

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 12-Dec-2019

CNR: APHC010420382019

Filing Number

CRLP/10474/2019

Filing Date

11-Dec-2019

Registration No

CRLP/7670/2019

Registration Date

11-Dec-2019

Judge

K Suresh Reddy

Coram

K Suresh Reddy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

Other offences not covered above ( 141 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS

Last updated 13-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Smt. Vallurupalli Sailaja

    Adv. K GANI REDDY

  2. 2.Smt. Vallurupalli Janaki

    Adv. K GANI REDDY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.Ushodaya Enterprises Pvt Ltd

    Adv. M R K CHAKRAVARTHY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

    The Andhra Pradesh High Court quashed criminal proceedings against two accused (daughter and wife of a General Manager) in a Rs. 5 crore embezzlement case, holding that mere transfer of misappropriated funds into their bank accounts, without evidence of knowledge or intentional aid, does not constitute abetment. The court found no material showing active participation in the fraud and declared continuing prosecution an abuse of legal process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    For Orders

    K Suresh Reddy

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

  8. 13-Feb-2026

    For Admission

    K Suresh Reddy

  9. 06-Feb-2026

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

  10. 06-Feb-2026

    For Admission

    K Suresh Reddy

  11. 31-Jan-2026

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

  12. 31-Jan-2026

    For Admission

    K Suresh Reddy

  13. 08-Jan-2026

    For Admission

    K Suresh Reddy

  14. 02-Jan-2026

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

  15. 02-Jan-2026

    For Admission

    K Suresh Reddy

  16. 26-Dec-2025

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

  17. 12-Dec-2025

    For Admission

    K Suresh Reddy

  18. 28-Nov-2025

    For Admission

    K Suresh Reddy

  19. 21-Nov-2025

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

  20. 07-Nov-2025

    For Admission

    K Suresh Reddy

  21. 31-Oct-2025

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

  22. 17-Oct-2025

    For Admission

    K Suresh Reddy

  23. 10-Oct-2025

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

  24. 10-Oct-2025

    For Admission

    K Suresh Reddy

  25. 19-Sep-2025

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

  26. 12-Sep-2025

    For Admission

    K Suresh Reddy

  27. 30-Aug-2025

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

  28. 18-Jul-2025

    Admission

    K Suresh Reddy

  29. 11-Jul-2025

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

  30. 30-Mar-2020

    Admission

    Cheekati Manavendranath Roy

  31. 16-Mar-2020

    Admission

    Cheekati Manavendranath Roy

  32. 26-Feb-2020

    Admission

    Cheekati Manavendranath Roy

  33. 24-Feb-2020

    Admission

    Cheekati Manavendranath Roy

  34. 10-Feb-2020

    Admission

    Cheekati Manavendranath Roy

  35. 20-Jan-2020

    Admission

    A V Sesha Sai

  36. 30-Dec-2019

    Admission

    Rakesh Kumar

  37. 26-Dec-2019

    Admission

    Rakesh Kumar

  38. 18-Dec-2019

    For Admission

    D.v.s.s.somayajulu

  39. 12-Dec-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 11-Dec-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/7670/2019

casestatus.in Summary

The Andhra Pradesh High Court quashed criminal proceedings against two accused (daughter and wife of a General Manager) in a Rs. 5 crore embezzlement case, holding that mere transfer of misappropriated funds into their bank accounts, without evidence of knowledge or intentional aid, does not constitute abetment. The court found no material showing active participation in the fraud and declared continuing prosecution an abuse of legal process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case