Kuraku Reddy Suresh vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/8076/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480,483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 18th August 2025.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010400182025

e-Filing Number

31-07-2025

Filing Number

CRLP/10084/2025

Filing Date

31-Jul-2025

Registration No

CRLP/8076/2025

Registration Date

31-Jul-2025

Judge

Y. Lakshmana Rao

Coram

Y. Lakshmana Rao

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s. 480 and 483 BNSS – Regular Bail(CRL.4B-N) ( 149 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

18-Aug-2025

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480,483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kuraku Reddy Suresh

    Adv. P V N KIRAN KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Venkata Jyothirmai PratapaView PDF

    The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed an interlocutory application (I.A. No. 1 of 2026) seeking to relax a condition requiring the petitioner to appear before the SHO at Sidhout Police Station every Saturday. The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution because the petitioner failed to appear or provide legal representation, while the State's Assistant Public Prosecutor was present. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Aug-2025

    Y. Lakshmana RaoView PDF

  4. 18-Aug-2025

    Y. Lakshmana RaoView PDF

  5. 18-Aug-2025

    Interlocutory (Regular Bails)

    Y. Lakshmana Rao

  6. 11-Aug-2025

    Interlocutory (Regular Bails)

    Y. Lakshmana Rao

  7. 04-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 31-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/8076/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed an interlocutory application (I.A. No. 1 of 2026) seeking to relax a condition requiring the petitioner to appear before the SHO at Sidhout Police Station every Saturday. The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution because the petitioner failed to appear or provide legal representation, while the State's Assistant Public Prosecutor was present. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case