SHAIK BABA FAKRUDDIN vs Y PEDDA KULLAYAMMA — SA/559/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 100. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th April 2026.
CNR: APHC010385922024
Filing Number
SA/30441/2024
Filing Date
04-Sep-2024
Registration No
SA/559/2024
Registration Date
05-Sep-2024
Judge
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao
Coram
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SA ( 22 )
Sub-Category
DECLARATION OF TITLE(IMMOVABLE PROPERTY) ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL Section
Decision Date
08-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHAIK BABA FAKRUDDIN
Adv. T V JAGGI REDDY
Respondent(s)
-
1.Y PEDDA KULLAYAMMA
-
2.T Chinna Kullayamma
-
3.A Krishna Murthy,
-
4.K Kumari
-
5.A Suryanarayana,
-
6.Bestha Parvathi
-
7.Anchala Kullaya Swamy,
-
8.K Suseelamma,
Adv. P DURGA PRASAD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Apr-2026
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna RaoView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed the plaintiff's second appeal seeking declaration of title over a property purchased in 2015 for Rs. 25,15,000 from defendants 1-7. The court upheld the concurrent findings of lower courts, holding that the plaintiff failed to establish valid title because his vendors had no legal right to sell the property—their father had already transferred it to defendant 8 through a registered sale deed in 1994 as manager of the ancestral Hindu Joint Family property. The principle "Nemo dat quod non habet" (no one can transfer better title than they possess) applied, and the subsequent sale 26 years later without disclosure constituted fraud rendering the plaintiff's acquisition invalid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna RaoView PDF
-
31-Mar-2026
For Orders
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao
-
16-Mar-2026
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna RaoView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Admission
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao
-
11-Mar-2026
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna RaoView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Admission
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao
-
25-Feb-2026
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna RaoView PDF
-
14-Oct-2025
Admission
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao
-
10-Oct-2025
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna RaoView PDF
-
10-Oct-2025
Admission
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao
-
18-Sep-2025
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna RaoView PDF
-
09-Jul-2025
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna RaoView PDF
-
09-Jul-2025
Admission
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao
-
03-Jul-2025
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna RaoView PDF
-
04-Nov-2024
For Admission (Sa Matters)
K Sreenivasa Reddy
-
28-Oct-2024
K Sreenivasa ReddyView PDF
-
18-Oct-2024
For Admission (Fresh Matters)
K Sreenivasa Reddy
-
20-Sep-2024
K Sreenivasa ReddyView PDF
-
20-Sep-2024
K Sreenivasa ReddyView PDF
-
20-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. SA/559/2024
Court Decision Summary The Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed the plaintiff's second appeal seeking declaration of title over a property purchased in 2015 for Rs. 25,15,000 from defendants 1-7. The court upheld the concurrent findings of lower courts, holding that the plaintiff failed to establish valid title because his vendors had no legal right to sell the property—their father had already transferred it to defendant 8 through a registered sale deed in 1994 as manager of the ancestral Hindu Joint Family property. The principle "Nemo dat quod non habet" (no one can transfer better title than they possess) applied, and the subsequent sale 26 years later without disclosure constituted fraud rendering the plaintiff's acquisition invalid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts