VALLEPU CHINNA RAMANNA vs THE STATE OF AP Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE — WP/16058/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

Next hearing 25-Jun-2026

CNR: APHC010309282026

Filing Number

WP/24795/2026

Filing Date

19-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/16058/2026

Registration Date

19-Jun-2026

Judge

B S Bhanumathi

Coram

B S Bhanumathi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

REVENUE (MISC.MATTERS) ( 37 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VALLEPU CHINNA RAMANNA

    Adv. S KRISHNA REDDY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF AP Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE

  2. 2.The District Collector,

  3. 3.The Joint Collector,

  4. 4.The Joint Collector,

  5. 5.The Revenue Divisional officer

  6. 6.The Tahsildar

  7. 7.The Village Revenue Officer,

  8. 8.The Sub-Inspector of Police

  9. 9.Burusu Ramanjaneyulu,

  10. 10.Burusu Veeranjaneyulu

  11. 11.Burusu Krishna

Case History

  1. 25-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Jun-2026

    Admission (Revenue)

    B S Bhanumathi

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    B S BhanumathiView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/16058/2026 On 19.06.2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh issued notice to respondents 9 and 10. The petitioner's counsel was permitted to serve notice via speed post with proof to be filed. The case was adjourned to 25.06.2026 for instructions, and respondents were directed to maintain status-quo until then. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 19-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 19-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/16058/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/16058/2026 On 19.06.2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh issued notice to respondents 9 and 10. The petitioner's counsel was permitted to serve notice via speed post with proof to be filed. The case was adjourned to 25.06.2026 for instructions, and respondents were directed to maintain status-quo until then. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case