YELUBANDI APPALA RAJU vs THE STATE OF AP — WP/15887/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

Next hearing 30-Jun-2026

CNR: APHC010305482026

Filing Number

WP/24484/2026

Filing Date

18-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/15887/2026

Registration Date

18-Jun-2026

Judge

Harinath.n

Coram

Harinath.n

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

SOCIAL WELFARE & TRIBAL WELFARE(MISC.MATTERS) ( 57 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.YELUBANDI APPALA RAJU

    Adv. K VENKATESH

  2. 2.Yelubandi Raja Rao,

  3. 3.Adapa Satyanarayana,

  4. 4.Adapa Rupa Mani,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF AP

  2. 2.The Tahsildar,

    Adv. GP FOR REVENUE

  3. 3.The Special Deputy Tahsildar,

  4. 4.The Village Surveyor,

  5. 5.Kunjam Lakshmi,

Case History

  1. 30-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Jun-2026

    Admission (Social Welfare)

    Harinath.n

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Harinath.nView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/15887/2026 The petitioners claimed ownership and possession of land in Sy.No.13/3 at Gondolu Village, Polavaram District. A survey report confirmed their possession, but a competing claimant (5th respondent) filed a complaint prompting the Tahsildar and Special Deputy Tahsildar to initiate eviction proceedings. The High Court granted an interim direction restraining respondents from interfering with petitioners' possession and enjoyment of the property, and adjourned the matter to 30.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 19-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 18-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/15887/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/15887/2026 The petitioners claimed ownership and possession of land in Sy.No.13/3 at Gondolu Village, Polavaram District. A survey report confirmed their possession, but a competing claimant (5th respondent) filed a complaint prompting the Tahsildar and Special Deputy Tahsildar to initiate eviction proceedings. The High Court granted an interim direction restraining respondents from interfering with petitioners' possession and enjoyment of the property, and adjourned the matter to 30.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case