Kunjam Vasantha Vijaya vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLRC/594/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438&442. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.

Next hearing 10-Jul-2026

CNR: APHC010304112026

e-Filing Number

15-06-2026

Filing Number

CRLP/6025/2026

Filing Date

17-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRLRC/594/2026

Registration Date

17-Jun-2026

Judge

Y. Lakshmana Rao

Coram

Y. Lakshmana Rao

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLRC ( 42 )

Sub-Category

Other offences not covered above ( 141 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438&442

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kunjam Vasantha Vijaya

    Adv. RAMAKRISHNA AKURATHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.Gottumukkala Trinath

Case History

  1. 10-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jul-2026

    For Admission

    Y. Lakshmana Rao

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Y. Lakshmana RaoView PDF

  4. 19-Jun-2026

    Y. Lakshmana RaoView PDF

    The High Court of Andhra Pradesh granted a conditional stay of proceedings dated 28.04.2026 in the trial court case against petitioner Kunjam Vasantha Vijaya. The stay is subject to the petitioner depositing 10% of the cheque amount within four weeks; failure to deposit will allow the trial court to proceed for recovery. Upon deposit, respondent Gottumukkala Trinath may withdraw the amount after providing satisfactory sureties to the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 19-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLRC/594/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh granted a conditional stay of proceedings dated 28.04.2026 in the trial court case against petitioner Kunjam Vasantha Vijaya. The stay is subject to the petitioner depositing 10% of the cheque amount within four weeks; failure to deposit will allow the trial court to proceed for recovery. Upon deposit, respondent Gottumukkala Trinath may withdraw the amount after providing satisfactory sureties to the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case