Y.Kalpana alias Polam Kalpana vs THE STATE OF AP Advocate - GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES — WP/15908/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

Next hearing 24-Jun-2026

CNR: APHC010303872026

Filing Number

WP/24357/2026

Filing Date

17-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/15908/2026

Registration Date

18-Jun-2026

Judge

Subba Reddy Satti

Coram

Subba Reddy Satti

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

CIVIL SUPPLIES AND ESSENTIASL COMMEDITIES ( 10 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Y.Kalpana alias Polam Kalpana

    Adv. B.ABHAY SIDDHANTH MOOTHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF AP Advocate - GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES

  2. 2.The District Collector

  3. 3.The Joint Collector (Civil Supplies)

  4. 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer

  5. 5.The Tahasildar

  6. 6.The Deputy Tahsildhar Civil Supplies)

  7. 7.The Village Revenue Officer

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Jun-2026

    Admission (Civil Supplies)

    Subba Reddy Satti

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Subba Reddy SattiView PDF

    Case Summary: In WP 15908/2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh adjourned the matter to 24.06.2026. The Government Pleader for Civil Supplies sought time to obtain instructions regarding implementation of a prior order (Ex.P1) by respondent No.5. The case was listed in the Adjourned Motion List for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 19-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/15908/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In WP 15908/2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh adjourned the matter to 24.06.2026. The Government Pleader for Civil Supplies sought time to obtain instructions regarding implementation of a prior order (Ex.P1) by respondent No.5. The case was listed in the Adjourned Motion List for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case