Kilaparthi Bhuvaneswari vs State of Andhra Pradesh — WP/15733/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Next hearing 19-Jun-2026

CNR: APHC010302962026

Filing Number

WP/24288/2026

Filing Date

17-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/15733/2026

Registration Date

17-Jun-2026

Judge

K Sreenivasa Reddy

Coram

K Sreenivasa Reddy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVP., (MISC.MATTERS) ( 35 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kilaparthi Bhuvaneswari

    Adv. MSVS SUDHA RANI

  2. 2.B. Raja Rao,

  3. 3.Chinthakayala Rama Murthy

  4. 4.Makireddi Peddi Naidu,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Andhra Pradesh

  2. 2.The District Collector

  3. 3.The District Panchayath Officer

  4. 4.Kusarlapudi Gram Panchayath

  5. 5.The Mandal Parishad Development Officer

  6. 6.The Deputy Mandal Parishad Development Officer

  7. 7.The Station House Officer

    Adv. GP FOR HOME

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    K Sreenivasa ReddyView PDF

    In WP 15733/2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh allowed petitioners Kilaparthi Bhuvaneswari, B. Raja Rao, and Chinthakayala Rama Murthy to pay outstanding shop rents to respondent authorities and directed the State not to evict them without following due process of law. The case was adjourned for four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Admission (Panchayat Raj)

    K Sreenivasa Reddy

  4. 18-Jun-2026

    K Sreenivasa ReddyView PDF

  5. 18-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/15733/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In WP 15733/2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh allowed petitioners Kilaparthi Bhuvaneswari, B. Raja Rao, and Chinthakayala Rama Murthy to pay outstanding shop rents to respondent authorities and directed the State not to evict them without following due process of law. The case was adjourned for four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case