Govind Krishna vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/4763/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

Next hearing 29-Jun-2026

CNR: APHC010302392026

e-Filing Number

17-06-2026

Filing Number

CRLP/5983/2026

Filing Date

17-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRLP/4763/2026

Registration Date

17-Jun-2026

Judge

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

Coram

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s. 528 BNSS Quash the FIR(CRL.5A-N) ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Govind Krishna

    Adv. SINGURU SAI KRISHNA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.The State

Case History

  1. 29-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Maheswara Rao KuncheamView PDF

    Case Summary: CRLP/4763/2026 On 18.06.2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh heard Govind Krishna's petition against alleged violations of the Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968 (FIR No.138 of 2026). The court adjourned the matter to 29.06.2026 after the Assistant Public Prosecutor requested time for instructions. Meanwhile, the petitioner's counsel was permitted to serve personal notice on respondent No.2 via Speed Post/Email/WhatsApp with proof of service to be filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/4763/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRLP/4763/2026 On 18.06.2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh heard Govind Krishna's petition against alleged violations of the Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968 (FIR No.138 of 2026). The court adjourned the matter to 29.06.2026 after the Assistant Public Prosecutor requested time for instructions. Meanwhile, the petitioner's counsel was permitted to serve personal notice on respondent No.2 via Speed Post/Email/WhatsApp with proof of service to be filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case