Sarreddy Subramanyam vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLA/375/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415(2). Status: For Admission (Fresh Matters). Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

For Admission (Fresh Matters) Next hearing 18-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: APHC010302372026

e-Filing Number

17-06-2026

Filing Number

CRLA/5982/2026

Filing Date

17-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRLA/375/2026

Registration Date

17-Jun-2026

Judge

K Suresh Reddy , Challa Gunaranjan

Coram

K Suresh Reddy , Challa Gunaranjan

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRLA ( 40 )

Sub-Category

Conviction ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sarreddy Subramanyam

    Adv. NEELAM SANKARA RAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.Mother of Victim

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    K Suresh Reddy,challa GunaranjanView PDF

    Case Summary: CRLA 375/2026 On 18.06.2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh admitted the criminal appeal filed by Sarreddy Subramanyam and condoned the 347-day delay in filing. However, the court dismissed the petitioner's bail application (I.A.No.2), holding that given his life sentence conviction for offences under Sections 366, 376AB, 341 IPC and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, bail enlargement was not warranted at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    For Admission (Fresh Matters)

    K Suresh Reddy , Challa Gunaranjan

  4. 17-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLA/375/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRLA 375/2026 On 18.06.2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh admitted the criminal appeal filed by Sarreddy Subramanyam and condoned the 347-day delay in filing. However, the court dismissed the petitioner's bail application (I.A.No.2), holding that given his life sentence conviction for offences under Sections 366, 376AB, 341 IPC and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, bail enlargement was not warranted at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case