BODE RAMACHANDRA YADAV vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/4758/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 10th September 2026.

Next hearing 10-Sep-2026

CNR: APHC010298402026

Filing Number

CRLP/5933/2026

Filing Date

15-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRLP/4758/2026

Registration Date

17-Jun-2026

Judge

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

Coram

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

Other offences not covered above ( 141 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BODE RAMACHANDRA YADAV

    Adv. UMESH CHANDRA P V G

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.S. Ramesh Babu

Case History

  1. 10-Sep-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Sep-2026

    For Admission

    Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Maheswara Rao KuncheamView PDF

    Case Summary: CRLP/4758/2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh granted Bode Ramachandra Yadav's (Accused No. 4) petition seeking dispensation from mandatory personal appearance before the trial court in an excise act violation case. The court found that the charge sheet contained only omnibus allegations against him with specific charges pertaining only to Accused Nos. 1 and 2. Accordingly, his presence was dispensed with except when the Magistrate deems it necessary. The matter was listed for 10.09.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 15-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/4758/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRLP/4758/2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh granted Bode Ramachandra Yadav's (Accused No. 4) petition seeking dispensation from mandatory personal appearance before the trial court in an excise act violation case. The court found that the charge sheet contained only omnibus allegations against him with specific charges pertaining only to Accused Nos. 1 and 2. Accordingly, his presence was dispensed with except when the Magistrate deems it necessary. The matter was listed for 10.09.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case