Bode Ramachandra Yadav, vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/4759/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

Next hearing 29-Jun-2026

CNR: APHC010297702026

Filing Number

CRLP/5892/2026

Filing Date

15-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRLP/4759/2026

Registration Date

17-Jun-2026

Judge

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

Coram

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.482 Cr.p.c Quash the F.I.R ( 63 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bode Ramachandra Yadav,

    Adv. UMESH CHANDRA P V G

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.Suggu Nagireddy

Case History

  1. 29-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Maheswara Rao KuncheamView PDF

    Case Summary: Crl.P.No.4759 of 2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh adjourned the petition filed by Bode Ramachandra Yadav against FIR No.129 of 2025 (Sections 196(1) and 352, BNS 2023). The petitioner claimed he could not attend a police notice under Section 35(3) BNSS due to professional, personal, and health reasons. The court permitted service on respondent No.2 via Speed Post/Email/WhatsApp and directed police authorities to strictly comply with Section 35(3) BNSS procedures. The matter was listed for 29.06.2026 with the Assistant Public Prosecutor seeking further instructions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 15-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/4759/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.P.No.4759 of 2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh adjourned the petition filed by Bode Ramachandra Yadav against FIR No.129 of 2025 (Sections 196(1) and 352, BNS 2023). The petitioner claimed he could not attend a police notice under Section 35(3) BNSS due to professional, personal, and health reasons. The court permitted service on respondent No.2 via Speed Post/Email/WhatsApp and directed police authorities to strictly comply with Section 35(3) BNSS procedures. The matter was listed for 29.06.2026 with the Assistant Public Prosecutor seeking further instructions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case