THE NELLORE PROGRESSIVE UNION vs THE TOWN HALL TRUST BOARD Advocate - Y L SIVA KALPANA REDDY — CRP/1640/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010295622026

Filing Number

CRP/23662/2026

Filing Date

15-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRP/1640/2026

Registration Date

17-Jun-2026

Judge

K Suresh Reddy

Coram

K Suresh Reddy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRP ( 9 )

Sub-Category

ARTICLE 227 ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL Section

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE NELLORE PROGRESSIVE UNION

    Adv. C SUBODH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE TOWN HALL TRUST BOARD Advocate - Y L SIVA KALPANA REDDY

  2. 2.The Town Hall Trust Board

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

    The Nellore Progressive Union challenged an order allowing the Town Hall Trust Board to record witness evidence (PW.2) via advocate commissioner in Bangalore in a property possession termination suit. The High Court of Andhra Pradesh disposed of the revision petition by consent order, setting aside the commissioner appointment and directing the 2nd plaintiff to appear before the trial court on 06.07.2026 for direct evidence recording, with the defendant permitted to conduct cross-examination on that date or forfeit the right. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    For Admission (Fresh Matters)

    K Suresh Reddy

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRP/1640/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Nellore Progressive Union challenged an order allowing the Town Hall Trust Board to record witness evidence (PW.2) via advocate commissioner in Bangalore in a property possession termination suit. The High Court of Andhra Pradesh disposed of the revision petition by consent order, setting aside the commissioner appointment and directing the 2nd plaintiff to appear before the trial court on 06.07.2026 for direct evidence recording, with the defendant permitted to conduct cross-examination on that date or forfeit the right. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case