M/s. D.V. Wines, vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, — WP/15882/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jul-2026

CNR: APHC010295222026

Filing Number

WP/23627/2026

Filing Date

15-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/15882/2026

Registration Date

18-Jun-2026

Judge

Ravi Cheemalapati

Coram

Ravi Cheemalapati

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

EXCISE (MISC.MATTERS) ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/s. D.V. Wines,

    Adv. KILARU NITHIN KRISHNA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh,

  2. 2.The Commissioner,

  3. 3.The Deputy Commissioner,

  4. 4.The District Prohibition and Excise officer,

  5. 5.The Station House Officer Prohibition and Excise Police Station Gudivada

Case History

  1. 17-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jul-2026

    Admission (Excise)

    Ravi Cheemalapati

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Ravi CheemalapatiView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 15882/2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh issued an interim order on M/s. D.V. Wines' petition challenging the respondents' demand for Rs. 7,50,000/- to establish permit rooms despite the petitioner not intending to do so. The Court directed respondents to refrain from coercive action and to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation within four weeks. The case was adjourned to 17.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 19-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 15-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/15882/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 15882/2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh issued an interim order on M/s. D.V. Wines' petition challenging the respondents' demand for Rs. 7,50,000/- to establish permit rooms despite the petitioner not intending to do so. The Court directed respondents to refrain from coercive action and to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation within four weeks. The case was adjourned to 17.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case