Sri Nallamilli Murali Mohana Bala Krishna Reddy, vs The state of Andhra Pradesh — WP/15455/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.

Next hearing 07-Jul-2026

CNR: APHC010293352026

Filing Number

WP/23448/2026

Filing Date

15-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/15455/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

K Sreenivasa Reddy

Coram

K Sreenivasa Reddy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVP., (MISC.MATTERS) ( 35 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sri Nallamilli Murali Mohana Bala Krishna Reddy,

    Adv. B V KRISHNA REDDY

  2. 2.Madapati Srinivasa Reddy,

  3. 3.Vallabhasett Rama Satish

  4. 4.Karri Santhi,

  5. 5.Sathi Madhusudhanareddy,

  6. 6.Sri Dr. Sathi Surya Narayana Reddy,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The state of Andhra Pradesh

  2. 2.The State of Andhra Pradesh,

    Adv. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS

  3. 3.The District Collector and Magistrate,

  4. 4.District Panchayat Raj Officer,

  5. 5.The Superintending Engineer,

  6. 6.Revenue Divisional Officer,

  7. 7.The Tahsildar,

  8. 8.The Gram Panchayat, Ramavaram Village,

Case History

  1. 07-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Jul-2026

    Admission (Panchayat Raj)

    K Sreenivasa Reddy

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    K Sreenivasa ReddyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/15455/2026 On 16.06.2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati adjourned the petition at the request of the petitioner's counsel. The matter was posted for hearing after three weeks, with no substantive order on the merits being passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 15-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/15455/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/15455/2026 On 16.06.2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati adjourned the petition at the request of the petitioner's counsel. The matter was posted for hearing after three weeks, with no substantive order on the merits being passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case