Pillikandla Venkata Subbaiah vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/4721/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: APHC010293342026

e-Filing Number

15-06-2026

Filing Number

CRLP/5874/2026

Filing Date

15-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRLP/4721/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

Coram

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s. 528 BNSS Quash the Proc. U/s. 85 BNS(CRL.5D-N) ( 153 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pillikandla Venkata Subbaiah

    Adv. DHEERA KANISHKA

  2. 2.Pillikandla Pavana Kumari

    Adv. DHEERA KANISHKA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.Pillikandla Sravani

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Maheswara Rao KuncheamView PDF

    Case Summary: CRLP/4721/2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dispensed with the mandatory presence of petitioners Pillikandla Venkata Subbaiah and Pillikandla Pavana Kumari (senior citizens and parents of accused No.1) before the trial court, except when the Magistrate deems their presence necessary. The court issued notice to the unofficial respondent and adjourned the matter for ten weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/4721/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRLP/4721/2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dispensed with the mandatory presence of petitioners Pillikandla Venkata Subbaiah and Pillikandla Pavana Kumari (senior citizens and parents of accused No.1) before the trial court, except when the Magistrate deems their presence necessary. The court issued notice to the unofficial respondent and adjourned the matter for ten weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case