KOPPULA RAMAKRISHNA vs THE STATE OF AP Advocate - GP FOR IRRI AND CAD — WP/15434/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.

Next hearing 15-Jul-2026

CNR: APHC010292132026

Filing Number

WP/23332/2026

Filing Date

15-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/15434/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

Subba Reddy Satti

Coram

Subba Reddy Satti

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

IRRIGATION & COMMAND AREA ( 42 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KOPPULA RAMAKRISHNA

    Adv. PAMARTHI KAMESWARA RAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF AP Advocate - GP FOR IRRI AND CAD

  2. 2.The District Collector (Irrigation Wing),

  3. 3.The Engineer-in-Chief,

  4. 4.The Superintending Engineer,

  5. 5.The Executive Engineer,

  6. 6.The Commissioner,

  7. 7.The State of Andhra Pradesh,

    Adv. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING

Case History

  1. 15-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jul-2026

    Admission - Payment Of Bills

    Subba Reddy Satti

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Subba Reddy SattiView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 15434/2026 In Writ Petition 15434/2026 before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, petitioner Koppula Ramakrishna challenged actions by the State of AP and irrigation/finance officials. The court adjourned the matter to 15.07.2026 at the request of Assistant Government Pleaders, deferring substantive consideration of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 15-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/15434/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 15434/2026 In Writ Petition 15434/2026 before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, petitioner Koppula Ramakrishna challenged actions by the State of AP and irrigation/finance officials. The court adjourned the matter to 15.07.2026 at the request of Assistant Government Pleaders, deferring substantive consideration of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case