M/s. Sri Sai Krishna Constructions vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - GP FOR IRRI AND CAD — WA/699/2026

Case under Letters Patent, 1866 Section 15. Status: For Admission. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

For Admission Next hearing 16-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: APHC010291752026

Filing Number

WA/23295/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

WA/699/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

K Suresh Reddy , A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

Coram

K Suresh Reddy , A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

WA ( 27 )

Sub-Category

IRRIGATION & COMMAND AREA ( 42 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Letters Patent, 1866 Section 15

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/s. Sri Sai Krishna Constructions

    Adv. SAI MANOJ REDDY L

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - GP FOR IRRI AND CAD

  2. 2.The Chief Engineer

  3. 3.The Superintending Engineer (FAC)

  4. 4.The Executive Engineer

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    K Suresh Reddy , A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    K Suresh Reddy,a. Hari Haranadha SarmaView PDF

    Case Summary: In WA No. 699/2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh adjourned the matter to 16.06.2026 after hearing both parties. The Court imposed an interim order restraining all parties from executing work or conducting any physical activity at the site pending the next hearing, as submitted by the Advocate General. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WA/699/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In WA No. 699/2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh adjourned the matter to 16.06.2026 after hearing both parties. The Court imposed an interim order restraining all parties from executing work or conducting any physical activity at the site pending the next hearing, as submitted by the Advocate General. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case