NATTI KUMAR vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR HOME — WP/15361/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

CNR: APHC010291532026

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/23273/2026

Filing Date

11-06-2026

Registration No

WP/15361/2026

Registration Date

11-06-2026

Judge

A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA

Coram

A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

HOME DEPARTMENT (MISC.MATTERS) ( 22 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

NATTI KUMAR

Adv. V V SATISH

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR HOME

The Commissioner of Police,

Pre-Litigation Forum

Station House officer,

Bathula Radhika

Hearing History

Judge: A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA

11-06-2026

ADMISSION (HOME)

16-06-2026

ADMISSION (HOME)

Orders

11-06-2026
A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA

Case Summary: WP/15361/2026 - NATTI KUMAR v. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Petitioner Natti Kumar challenged police interference in a civil business dispute with Respondent No. 5, alleging the Pre-Litigation Counselling Forum was being used to coerce settlement. The High Court of Andhra Pradesh granted interim relief on 11.06.2026, directing police to suspend all proceedings under the disputed notice dated 18.05.2026 pending final hearing. The case was adjourned to 25.06.2026 for respondents to file counter-affidavits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/15361/2026 - NATTI KUMAR v. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Petitioner Natti Kumar challenged police interference in a civil business dispute with Respondent No. 5, alleging the Pre-Litigation Counselling Forum was being used to coerce settlement. The High Court of Andhra Pradesh granted interim relief on 11.06.2026, directing police to suspend all proceedings under the disputed notice dated 18.05.2026 pending final hearing. The case was adjourned to 25.06.2026 for respondents to file counter-affidavits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case