MUGA RAJAMMA vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE — WP/15359/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Status: Admission (Revenue). Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Admission (Revenue) Next hearing 15-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: APHC010291472026

Filing Number

WP/23267/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/15359/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

B S Bhanumathi

Coram

B S Bhanumathi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

REVENUE (MISC.MATTERS) ( 37 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUGA RAJAMMA

    Adv. NAVULURU KRISHNA SAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE

  2. 2.The District Collector,

  3. 3.The Joint Collector

  4. 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer

  5. 5.The Tahsildar,

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Admission (Revenue)

    K Suresh Reddy

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/15359/2026 On 11.06.2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh (Judge KSR, J) adjourned the writ petition filed by Muga Rajamma against the State of Andhra Pradesh and the District Collector. The case was posted for further hearing on 15.06.2026 at the request of the learned Government Pleader for Revenue. No substantive order on merits was passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/15359/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/15359/2026 On 11.06.2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh (Judge KSR, J) adjourned the writ petition filed by Muga Rajamma against the State of Andhra Pradesh and the District Collector. The case was posted for further hearing on 15.06.2026 at the request of the learned Government Pleader for Revenue. No substantive order on merits was passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case