Rudru Nagaraju vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Advocate - GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP — WP/15358/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 11th June 2026.

CNR: APHC010291442026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/23264/2026

Filing Date

11-06-2026

Registration No

WP/15358/2026

Registration Date

11-06-2026

Judge

SUBBA REDDY SATTI

Coram

SUBBA REDDY SATTI

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MUNICIPALITY AND URBAN DEVP.(MISC.MATTERS) ( 30 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

11th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

Rudru Nagaraju

Adv. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA

Respondent(s)

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Advocate - GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP

The Mangalagiri-Tadepalli Municipal Corporation,

The Commissioner,

The Town Planning Officer,

Hearing History

Judge: SUBBA REDDY SATTI

11-06-2026

ADMISSION (MUNICIPAL ADMN.)

Orders

11-06-2026
SUBBA REDDY SATTI

Case Summary: WP 15358/2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh disposed of petitioner Rudru Nagaraju's writ petition challenging the municipal corporation's attempt to dispossess him from 0.22 acres of land in Nowluru Village without due process. The court directed the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner's possession without following proper procedure, while restraining the petitioner from making further constructions. The petition was disposed at admission stage by consent, without deciding merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 15358/2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh disposed of petitioner Rudru Nagaraju's writ petition challenging the municipal corporation's attempt to dispossess him from 0.22 acres of land in Nowluru Village without due process. The court directed the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner's possession without following proper procedure, while restraining the petitioner from making further constructions. The petition was disposed at admission stage by consent, without deciding merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Constitution of India All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case