Rudru Nagaraju vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Advocate - GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP — WP/15358/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010291442026

Filing Number

WP/23264/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/15358/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Subba Reddy Satti

Coram

Subba Reddy Satti

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MUNICIPALITY AND URBAN DEVP.(MISC.MATTERS) ( 30 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rudru Nagaraju

    Adv. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh, Advocate - GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP

  2. 2.The Mangalagiri-Tadepalli Municipal Corporation,

  3. 3.The Commissioner,

  4. 4.The Town Planning Officer,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Subba Reddy SattiView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 15358/2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh disposed of petitioner Rudru Nagaraju's writ petition challenging the municipal corporation's attempt to dispossess him from 0.22 acres of land in Nowluru Village without due process. The court directed the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner's possession without following proper procedure, while restraining the petitioner from making further constructions. The petition was disposed at admission stage by consent, without deciding merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    Subba Reddy Satti

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/15358/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 15358/2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh disposed of petitioner Rudru Nagaraju's writ petition challenging the municipal corporation's attempt to dispossess him from 0.22 acres of land in Nowluru Village without due process. The court directed the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner's possession without following proper procedure, while restraining the petitioner from making further constructions. The petition was disposed at admission stage by consent, without deciding merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case