V. Ramalingeswara Reddy vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - GP FOR SERVICES I — WP/15335/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010291172026

Filing Number

WP/23256/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/15335/2026

Registration Date

09-Jun-2026

Judge

Subba Reddy Satti

Coram

Subba Reddy Satti

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MUNICIPALITY AND URBAN DEVP.(MISC.MATTERS) ( 30 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.V. Ramalingeswara Reddy

    Adv. S SRINIVASA RAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - GP FOR SERVICES I

  2. 2.The Directorate of Town and Country Planning

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Subba Reddy SattiView PDF

    The High Court disposed of the writ petition at the admission stage, directing the State of Andhra Pradesh to consider the petitioner's promotion to Deputy Director in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.257 (dated 10.06.1999), if he falls within the zone of consideration. The court accepted the government's undertaking to consider the petitioner's case for promotion without being deferred solely by pending disciplinary proceedings related to alleged supervision lapses during 2019-2020. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Admission (Service Matters)

    Subba Reddy Satti

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/15335/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court disposed of the writ petition at the admission stage, directing the State of Andhra Pradesh to consider the petitioner's promotion to Deputy Director in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.257 (dated 10.06.1999), if he falls within the zone of consideration. The court accepted the government's undertaking to consider the petitioner's case for promotion without being deferred solely by pending disciplinary proceedings related to alleged supervision lapses during 2019-2020. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case