Konala Siva Lakshmi vs The State of A.P. Advocate - GP FOR HOME — WP/15328/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: APHC010291042026

Filing Number

WP/23251/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/15328/2026

Registration Date

09-Jun-2026

Judge

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

Coram

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

HOME DEPARTMENT (MISC.MATTERS) ( 22 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Konala Siva Lakshmi

    Adv. K RATNA SAGAR

  2. 2.Chadalavada Gowri

  3. 3.Thirumalasetti Sitamahalakshmi

  4. 4.Maddala Jaya Kumari

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of A.P. Advocate - GP FOR HOME

  2. 2.The Suprintendent of Police

  3. 3.The Dy. Superintendent of Police

  4. 4.The Circle Inspector of Police

  5. 5.The Sub-Inspector of Police

  6. 6.Bhusarapu Subramanyam

  7. 7.Bhusarapu Srinivasa Babu

  8. 8.Bhusarapu Brahma Yesu Babu

  9. 9.Yenumula Krishna Padmariju

  10. 10.Malla Tulasi Ram

  11. 11.Thota Bala Satyanarayana

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Maheswara Rao KuncheamView PDF

    Case Summary: In WP No. 15328 of 2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh adjourned the matter to 29.06.2026. The petitioners' counsel stated that a status-quo order had been previously granted but not placed on record; the court allowed time for the petitioners to file this order. The Assistant Government Pleader for Home was directed to obtain instructions on the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Admission (Home)

    A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/15328/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In WP No. 15328 of 2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh adjourned the matter to 29.06.2026. The petitioners' counsel stated that a status-quo order had been previously granted but not placed on record; the court allowed time for the petitioners to file this order. The Assistant Government Pleader for Home was directed to obtain instructions on the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case