Cheemakurthy Subramanyam vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - GP FOR HOME — WP/15321/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010290792026

Filing Number

WP/23235/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/15321/2026

Registration Date

09-Jun-2026

Judge

A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

Coram

A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

HOME DEPARTMENT (MISC.MATTERS) ( 22 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Cheemakurthy Subramanyam

    Adv. PONNEKANTI MALLIKARJUNA RAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - GP FOR HOME

  2. 2.The Director General of Police

  3. 3.The Superintendent of Police

  4. 4.The Deputy Superintendent of Police

  5. 5.The Station House Officer

  6. 6.Sriram Venkatarao

  7. 7.Yerremala Pitchi Reddy

  8. 8.Uppala Ramakrishna

  9. 9.Sri Cheemakurthy Kiran

  10. 10.Smt Pravallika

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    A. Hari Haranadha SarmaView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 15321/2026 Advocate Cheemakurthy Subramanyam sought a writ of mandamus challenging police interference in a civil dispute over business accounts and share settlement with his son and daughter-in-law. The High Court of Andhra Pradesh accepted the state's submission that police were merely conducting inquiries into alleged threats and were not interfering in the civil dispute, with both parties agreeing to resolve matters amicably. The court disposed of the petition while directing police to strictly refrain from interfering in civil disputes and act in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Admission (Home)

    A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/15321/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 15321/2026 Advocate Cheemakurthy Subramanyam sought a writ of mandamus challenging police interference in a civil dispute over business accounts and share settlement with his son and daughter-in-law. The High Court of Andhra Pradesh accepted the state's submission that police were merely conducting inquiries into alleged threats and were not interfering in the civil dispute, with both parties agreeing to resolve matters amicably. The court disposed of the petition while directing police to strictly refrain from interfering in civil disputes and act in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case