PILLA SIVA SANKAR vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR IRRI AND CAD — WP/15310/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Status: Admission (Irrigation and Cad). Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

Admission (Irrigation and Cad) Next hearing 29-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: APHC010290742026

Filing Number

WP/23232/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/15310/2026

Registration Date

09-Jun-2026

Judge

K Suresh Reddy

Coram

K Suresh Reddy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

IRRIGATION & COMMAND AREA ( 42 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PILLA SIVA SANKAR

    Adv. V V SATISH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR IRRI AND CAD

  2. 2.The Executive Engineer,

  3. 3.Assistant Executive Engineer,

Case History

  1. 29-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Jun-2026

    Admission (Irrigation and Cad)

    K Suresh Reddy

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    K Suresh ReddyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 15310/2026 Outcome: The petition was partly allowed. The court directed the petitioner to construct a slab culvert across the Tumma Kaluva in strict compliance with irrigation department proceedings, granted time until 29.06.2026 for removal of unauthorized cement pipes and road, and restrained respondents from taking coercive action pending compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 11-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/15310/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 15310/2026 Outcome: The petition was partly allowed. The court directed the petitioner to construct a slab culvert across the Tumma Kaluva in strict compliance with irrigation department proceedings, granted time until 29.06.2026 for removal of unauthorized cement pipes and road, and restrained respondents from taking coercive action pending compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case