Bandaru Venganna vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - GP FOR HOME — WP/15313/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010290712026

Filing Number

WP/23230/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/15313/2026

Registration Date

09-Jun-2026

Judge

A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

Coram

A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

HOME DEPARTMENT (MISC.MATTERS) ( 22 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bandaru Venganna

    Adv. N A RAMACHANDRA MURTHY

  2. 2.Siddabattuni Bala Venkata Sal Kiran

  3. 3.Kommuri Lakshmi Narasimha Rao

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - GP FOR HOME

  2. 2.The Superintendent of Police

  3. 3.Deputy Superintendent of Police

  4. 4.The Circle Inspector of Police

  5. 5.Muttavarapu Subbarao

  6. 6.Cherukuri Sambasivarao

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    A. Hari Haranadha SarmaView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/15313/2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh disposed of the writ petition filed by three petitioners seeking protection from police interference in a civil money dispute. The police had received a complaint from 51 agricultural farmers alleging the petitioners had taken amounts and agricultural produce with false repayment assurances. The court directed police not to interfere if the dispute is purely civil in nature, while reserving police authority to take action if any criminal offense is established. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Admission (Home)

    A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/15313/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/15313/2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh disposed of the writ petition filed by three petitioners seeking protection from police interference in a civil money dispute. The police had received a complaint from 51 agricultural farmers alleging the petitioners had taken amounts and agricultural produce with false repayment assurances. The court directed police not to interfere if the dispute is purely civil in nature, while reserving police authority to take action if any criminal offense is established. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case