BANDARU NAVEEN KUMAR vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - THE ADVOCATE GENERAL — WP/15307/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

CNR: APHC010290692026

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/23229/2026

Filing Date

09-06-2026

Registration No

WP/15307/2026

Registration Date

09-06-2026

Judge

K SURESH REDDY , A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA

Coram

K SURESH REDDY , A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

HABEAS CORPUS ( 21 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

BANDARU NAVEEN KUMAR

Adv. YARRAMSETTY VENKATESH

Respondent(s)

The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - THE ADVOCATE GENERAL

The Superintendent of Police,

The Deputy Superintendent of Police,

The Station House Officer,

Merugu Rajendra,

Hearing History

Judge: K SURESH REDDY , A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA

11-06-2026

ADMISSION (HABEAS CORPUS)

16-06-2026

FOR APPEARANCE

Orders

11-06-2026
K SURESH REDDY,A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA

Case Summary: WP 15307/2026 Bandaru Naveen Kumar filed a Writ of Habeas Corpus petition alleging that his wife, Merugu Soujanya, was forcibly taken and illegally confined by her father (5th respondent) after their marriage on 06.05.2026. The High Court of Andhra Pradesh adjourned the matter to 16.06.2026 for appearance after the respondents stated that Merugu Soujanya was voluntarily residing with her parents and requested time to produce her before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 15307/2026 Bandaru Naveen Kumar filed a Writ of Habeas Corpus petition alleging that his wife, Merugu Soujanya, was forcibly taken and illegally confined by her father (5th respondent) after their marriage on 06.05.2026. The High Court of Andhra Pradesh adjourned the matter to 16.06.2026 for appearance after the respondents stated that Merugu Soujanya was voluntarily residing with her parents and requested time to produce her before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case