Smt. Kovvuri Nagamani vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - GP FOR HOME — WP/15316/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 11th June 2026.
CNR: APHC010290642026
Filing Number
WP/23224/2026
Filing Date
09-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/15316/2026
Registration Date
09-Jun-2026
Judge
A. Hari Haranadha Sarma
Coram
A. Hari Haranadha Sarma
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
HOME DEPARTMENT (MISC.MATTERS) ( 22 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Decision Date
11-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Smt. Kovvuri Nagamani
Adv. V SAI KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - GP FOR HOME
-
2.The Director General of Police
-
3.The Superintendent of Police
-
4.The Station House Officer
-
5.Narayana Murthy
-
6.Gorapalli Chinababu
-
7.Hanumanthu Sanyasi Rao
-
8.Manchina Appana Dora
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Jun-2026
A. Hari Haranadha SarmaView PDF
Summary: The Andhra Pradesh High Court disposed of a writ petition by Smt. Kovvuri Nagamani seeking to restrain police interference in her civil dispute (O.S. No. 14 of 2026) with Gorapalli Chinababu and others. The petitioner alleged inconsistent treatment—while police directed her to approach civil court when she filed a complaint, they interfered when the opposing parties approached them regarding the same dispute. The court, accepting the government's written submissions that police have no intention to interfere with civil matters, directed police not to intervene in civil disputes pending before the competent civil court, while preserving police authority to proceed if cognizable offences are involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
Admission (Home)
A. Hari Haranadha Sarma
-
09-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/15316/2026
Summary: The Andhra Pradesh High Court disposed of a writ petition by Smt. Kovvuri Nagamani seeking to restrain police interference in her civil dispute (O.S. No. 14 of 2026) with Gorapalli Chinababu and others. The petitioner alleged inconsistent treatment—while police directed her to approach civil court when she filed a complaint, they interfered when the opposing parties approached them regarding the same dispute. The court, accepting the government's written submissions that police have no intention to interfere with civil matters, directed police not to intervene in civil disputes pending before the competent civil court, while preserving police authority to proceed if cognizable offences are involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts