Mylapalli Koteswara Rao, vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Advocate - GP FOR HOME — WP/15297/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED NO COSTS on 11th June 2026.
CNR: APHC010290552026
Filing Number
WP/23216/2026
Filing Date
09-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/15297/2026
Registration Date
09-Jun-2026
Judge
A. Hari Haranadha Sarma
Coram
A. Hari Haranadha Sarma
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
HOME DEPARTMENT (MISC.MATTERS) ( 22 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Decision Date
11-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CLOSED NO COSTS
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mylapalli Koteswara Rao,
Adv. N SRIHARI
-
2.Mylapalli Satyanarayana,
-
3.Mylapalli Jagan Mohan Rao,
-
4.Mylapalli Jagadeswara Rao,
-
5.Mylapalli Kondala Rao,
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Andhra Pradesh, Advocate - GP FOR HOME
-
2.The Superintendent of Police,
-
3.The District Collector (Revenue Wing),
Adv. GP FOR REVENUE
-
4.The Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO),
-
5.The Tashsildar,
-
6.The Station House Officer,
-
7.Malla Venkata Appa Rao,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Jun-2026
A. Hari Haranadha SarmaView PDF
Case Summary: WP/15297/2026 The Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the Mylapalli brothers challenging police and revenue officials' alleged interference in their possession of 1.40 acres of land (Sy.No.798/12) in Anakapalli District. The court accepted the Assistant Government Pleader's submission that the dispute was civil in nature, not criminal, and directed the petitioners to pursue their claims through civil court proceedings rather than seeking extraordinary writ relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
Admission (Home)
A. Hari Haranadha Sarma
-
09-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/15297/2026
Case Summary: WP/15297/2026 The Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the Mylapalli brothers challenging police and revenue officials' alleged interference in their possession of 1.40 acres of land (Sy.No.798/12) in Anakapalli District. The court accepted the Assistant Government Pleader's submission that the dispute was civil in nature, not criminal, and directed the petitioners to pursue their claims through civil court proceedings rather than seeking extraordinary writ relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts