Nandikattu Veera Venkata Surya Syam Prasad, vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Advocate - GP FOR HOME — WP/15295/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010290542026

Filing Number

WP/23215/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/15295/2026

Registration Date

09-Jun-2026

Judge

A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

Coram

A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

HOME DEPARTMENT (MISC.MATTERS) ( 22 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nandikattu Veera Venkata Surya Syam Prasad,

    Adv. VENSO LAW FIRM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh, Advocate - GP FOR HOME

  2. 2.The Director General of Police,

  3. 3.The Superintendent of Police,

  4. 4.The Station House Officer,

  5. 5.Pathakota Pavithra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    A. Hari Haranadha SarmaView PDF

    The High Court disposed of the writ petition after the petitioner was summoned by police in connection with a man-missing case filed by his brother's wife (5th respondent). The court accepted the petitioner's undertaking to cooperate with the investigation and directed police not to unnecessarily summon him, while mandating strict compliance with BNSS procedures. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Admission (Home)

    A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/15295/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court disposed of the writ petition after the petitioner was summoned by police in connection with a man-missing case filed by his brother's wife (5th respondent). The court accepted the petitioner's undertaking to cooperate with the investigation and directed police not to unnecessarily summon him, while mandating strict compliance with BNSS procedures. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case