T RAJA REDDY vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - GP FOR HOME — WP/15294/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010290522026

Filing Number

WP/23214/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/15294/2026

Registration Date

09-Jun-2026

Judge

A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

Coram

A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

HOME DEPARTMENT (MISC.MATTERS) ( 22 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.T RAJA REDDY

    Adv. BOTTA ARUNA

  2. 2.T.Bharathamma ,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - GP FOR HOME

  2. 2.The Superintendent of Police,

  3. 3.The SHO (Station House Officer) I town Police Station,

  4. 4..P.Bhaskar Reddy

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    A. Hari Haranadha SarmaView PDF

    Summary of WP/15294/2026 The petitioners sought a Writ of Mandamus to prevent police interference in a civil dispute over unpaid dues. The court accepted the Assistant Government Pleader's statement that police had properly identified the dispute as civil in nature and directed parties to resolve it through civil court proceedings. The court closed the petition, finding no police interference warranted further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Admission (Home)

    A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/15294/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WP/15294/2026 The petitioners sought a Writ of Mandamus to prevent police interference in a civil dispute over unpaid dues. The court accepted the Assistant Government Pleader's statement that police had properly identified the dispute as civil in nature and directed parties to resolve it through civil court proceedings. The court closed the petition, finding no police interference warranted further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case