Ammisetty Siva Shankara Rao vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH — WP/15286/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010290452026

Filing Number

WP/23207/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/15286/2026

Registration Date

09-Jun-2026

Judge

Subba Reddy Satti

Coram

Subba Reddy Satti

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVP., (MISC.MATTERS) ( 35 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ammisetty Siva Shankara Rao

    Adv. MARELLA RADHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

  2. 2.The District Collector

    Adv. GP FOR REVENUE

  3. 3.The Mandal Tahasildar

  4. 4.The District Panchayath Officer

  5. 5.The Mandal Parishad Development Officer

  6. 6.The Venkatakrishnapuram Gram Panchayat

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Subba Reddy SattiView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/15286/2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh disposed of petitioner Ammisetty Siva Shankara Rao's writ petition challenging the respondent authorities' interference with his property (224 sq. yards with structure D.No.26-32) without due procedure. The court, accepting the respondents' written submission that they would not interfere with the property, granted relief by directing respondents 3-6 not to interfere with the land and structure without following due procedure, thereby protecting the petitioner's property rights against arbitrary government action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Admission (Panchayat Raj)

    Subba Reddy Satti

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/15286/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/15286/2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh disposed of petitioner Ammisetty Siva Shankara Rao's writ petition challenging the respondent authorities' interference with his property (224 sq. yards with structure D.No.26-32) without due procedure. The court, accepting the respondents' written submission that they would not interfere with the property, granted relief by directing respondents 3-6 not to interfere with the land and structure without following due procedure, thereby protecting the petitioner's property rights against arbitrary government action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case