M/s Bhagya Lakshmi Medical Agencies vs M/s.Sri Vinayaka Medical Stores (New). — CRP/1604/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010289892026

Filing Number

CRP/23152/2026

Filing Date

04-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRP/1604/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Subba Reddy Satti

Coram

Subba Reddy Satti

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRP ( 9 )

Sub-Category

ARTICLE 227 ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL Section

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/s Bhagya Lakshmi Medical Agencies

    Adv. GANGARAJU JAGADEESACHANDRABABU NARASIMHA

  2. 2.Kodali Bhagya Lakshmi,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/s.Sri Vinayaka Medical Stores (New).

  2. 2.Narendra Nagajyothi,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Subba Reddy SattiView PDF

    Case Summary: CRP/1604/2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh allowed the petitioners' civil revision petition challenging the Guntur Vacation Court's repeated rejection of their commercial dispute plaint on jurisdictional grounds. The court held that vacation officers appointed to Krishna District during summer vacation possess jurisdiction over commercial disputes, whereas the Guntur vacation officer lacks such jurisdiction. Consequently, the court granted liberty to the petitioners to refile their amount recovery suit before the Vacation Officer at Krishna District instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    For Admission (Crp Matters)

    Subba Reddy Satti

  4. 04-Jun-2026

    Subba Reddy SattiView PDF

  5. 04-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 04-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRP/1604/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRP/1604/2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh allowed the petitioners' civil revision petition challenging the Guntur Vacation Court's repeated rejection of their commercial dispute plaint on jurisdictional grounds. The court held that vacation officers appointed to Krishna District during summer vacation possess jurisdiction over commercial disputes, whereas the Guntur vacation officer lacks such jurisdiction. Consequently, the court granted liberty to the petitioners to refile their amount recovery suit before the Vacation Officer at Krishna District instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case