MANCHUKONDA RAMAKRISHNA vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - GP FOR HOME — WP/15266/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010289762026

Filing Number

WP/23140/2026

Filing Date

04-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/15266/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

Coram

A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

HOME DEPARTMENT (MISC.MATTERS) ( 22 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANCHUKONDA RAMAKRISHNA

    Adv. BONU RAMA SHANKAR RAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - GP FOR HOME

  2. 2.The Commissioner of Police,

  3. 3.The P.L.C.F. (Pre. Litigation Counsel Forum)

  4. 4.The Station House Officer,

  5. 5.Pinisetty Someswara Rao,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    A. Hari Haranadha SarmaView PDF

    Summary of WP No. 15266 of 2026: The court granted the writ petition and restrained police and the Pre-litigation Counsel Forum from interfering with a pending civil property dispute. The petitioner had entered into an agreement to purchase a property in Visakhapatnam and filed a suit for specific performance; however, police summoned him based on a complaint filed before the Forum. The court held that police lack competence to summon parties in civil disputes and that the Forum cannot entertain matters already sub-judice before a competent civil court, directing cessation of such interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Admission (Home)

    A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

  4. 04-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/15266/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WP No. 15266 of 2026: The court granted the writ petition and restrained police and the Pre-litigation Counsel Forum from interfering with a pending civil property dispute. The petitioner had entered into an agreement to purchase a property in Visakhapatnam and filed a suit for specific performance; however, police summoned him based on a complaint filed before the Forum. The court held that police lack competence to summon parties in civil disputes and that the Forum cannot entertain matters already sub-judice before a competent civil court, directing cessation of such interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case