Somayyagari Nageswara Rao vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - GP FOR HOME — WP/15193/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--CLOSED NO COSTS on 05th June 2026.
CNR: APHC010289602026
Filing Number
WP/23125/2026
Filing Date
03-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/15193/2026
Registration Date
03-Jun-2026
Judge
A. Hari Haranadha Sarma
Coram
A. Hari Haranadha Sarma
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
HOME DEPARTMENT (MISC.MATTERS) ( 22 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Decision Date
05-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CLOSED NO COSTS
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Somayyagari Nageswara Rao
Adv. K ANJANA RAMA KAMESWARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Andhra Pradesh Advocate - GP FOR HOME
-
2.The Commissioner of Police
-
3.The SHO (Station House Officer)
-
4.Santhamma
-
5.Somayyagari Sunil
-
6.Sravanthi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-Jun-2026
A. Hari Haranadha SarmaView PDF
-
05-Jun-2026
A. Hari Haranadha SarmaView PDF
Case Summary: WP 15193/2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the writ petition filed by Somayyagari Nageswara Rao seeking protection from police interference with his land possession. The petitioner alleged that police were interfering with his peaceful possession of agricultural land (5.28 guntas) used for aquaculture following a dispute with family members. The court accepted the state's submission that police authorities are proceeding lawfully regarding related criminal cases and are not inappropriately interfering with the civil dispute, closing the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jun-2026
Admission (Home)
A. Hari Haranadha Sarma
-
04-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/15193/2026
Case Summary: WP 15193/2026 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the writ petition filed by Somayyagari Nageswara Rao seeking protection from police interference with his land possession. The petitioner alleged that police were interfering with his peaceful possession of agricultural land (5.28 guntas) used for aquaculture following a dispute with family members. The court accepted the state's submission that police authorities are proceeding lawfully regarding related criminal cases and are not inappropriately interfering with the civil dispute, closing the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts