JAVVAJI PRAVEEN vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/4677/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--CLOSED NO COSTS on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010289512026

Filing Number

CRLP/5822/2026

Filing Date

03-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRLP/4677/2026

Registration Date

03-Jun-2026

Judge

A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

Coram

A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

Other offences not covered above ( 141 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CLOSED NO COSTS

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAVVAJI PRAVEEN

    Adv. RAVI TEJA DOMMETI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.The Superintendent of Police

  3. 3.The Circle Inspector of Police

  4. 4.The Station House Officer,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    A. Hari Haranadha SarmaView PDF

    Case Summary: CRLP/4677/2026 Javvaji Praveen, a third party to Crime No. 86/2025, sought to quash a Section 179 BNSS witness summons issued by police, fearing mistreatment during investigation. The High Court dismissed the petition but granted protective safeguards: the Station House Officer was directed to permit Praveen's advocate to accompany him during police investigations and strictly comply with legal procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    A. Hari Haranadha Sarma

  4. 04-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/4677/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRLP/4677/2026 Javvaji Praveen, a third party to Crime No. 86/2025, sought to quash a Section 179 BNSS witness summons issued by police, fearing mistreatment during investigation. The High Court dismissed the petition but granted protective safeguards: the Station House Officer was directed to permit Praveen's advocate to accompany him during police investigations and strictly comply with legal procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case